Short answer
The Antiquities Act is the 1906 law that lets the President create national monuments by public proclamation on federal land. Its land limit is express. Reduction or revocation is not.
- 1906
- enacted, signed June 8 by Theodore Roosevelt
- 54 U.S.C. §§ 320301-320303
- current U.S. Code location
- President
- designation authority by public proclamation
- Federal land only
- statutory boundary
- Unresolved
- reduction or revocation question
This page follows the current U.S. Code text in effect through Public Law 119-120, the 1906 Act as enacted, CRS Report R41330 updated February 11, 2025, CRS Report R49048 updated July 30, 2026, and the July 2026 presidential proclamations modifying Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante. The hard questions are narrow: how far a proclamation may reach, what counts as an object of historic or scientific interest, and whether a later President may pull the boundary back.
Statute grid
| Property | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Enacted | June 8, 1906 | Act of June 8, 1906, ch. 3060, 34 Stat. 225 |
| Current U.S. Code location | 54 U.S.C. §§ 320301-320303 | U.S. Code, Chapter 3203 |
| Original citation | Act of June 8, 1906, ch. 3060, 34 Stat. 225 | Statutes at Large |
| Designation authority | President, by public proclamation | 54 U.S.C. § 320301(a) |
| Land covered | Land owned or controlled by the Federal Government | 54 U.S.C. § 320301(a) |
| Objects protected | Historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest | 54 U.S.C. § 320301(a) |
| Land reservation limit | Parcels must be confined to “the smallest area compatible with the proper care and management of the objects to be protected” | 54 U.S.C. § 320301(b) |
| Lead agency | No single lead agency. Management depends on the land, proclamation, and later agency action | CRS R41330, updated February 11, 2025; CRS R49048, updated July 30, 2026 |
| What it regulates | Presidential designation and reservation of federal land as national monuments, plus permits for examination, excavation, and gathering of certain objects | 54 U.S.C. §§ 320301-320302 |
| Permits it creates | Permits for examination of ruins, excavation of archeological sites, and gathering of objects of antiquity | 54 U.S.C. § 320302 |
| Penalties | Criminal penalties for unauthorized appropriation, excavation, injury, or destruction | 54 U.S.C. § 320303 |
| Citizen-suit provision | None in the Antiquities Act | U.S. Code text |
| Latest amendment or rule change reflected here | Title 54 recodification by Pub. L. 113-287, Dec. 19, 2014; July 13, 2026 proclamations modifying Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante reflected as presidential actions, not statutory amendments | U.S. Code notes; Proclamations 11043 and 11044 |
| Key court decisions | Cameron v. United States, Cappaert v. United States, Massachusetts Lobstermen’s Association v. Ross, and the Tenth Circuit’s 2026 Utah monument decision | Court opinions and CRS reports |
Two lines carry most of the legal weight. Section 320301(a) gives the President proclamation power. Section 320301(b) gives the statute its boundary rule. That is why monument fights often become fights about scope, not about whether the President may act at all.
What the President can do
Under 54 U.S.C. § 320301(a), the President may declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest on federal land to be national monuments. The proclamation is the act. Congress does not pass a new monument statute each time, and the result is not a national park unless Congress later says so.
We read the Act as a limited delegation, not a blank check. The President may identify the protected objects and reserve the federal land needed for their care. The President may not use the Act to rewrite the public lands code.
Three parts matter at the start: the object must fit the text, the land must be federal, and the reserved area must be the smallest area compatible with proper care and management of the protected objects.
Federal land is the line
The statute reaches land “owned or controlled by the Federal Government.” That phrase keeps the Act inside the federal land system and out of private title.
A monument boundary does not turn private land into federal land. It does not convert state land or erase tribal title by itself. If a proclamation refers to nonfederal parcels, inholdings, future acquisitions, or access across mixed ownership, read those parts with care. The Antiquities Act sets the monument line. It does not supply every property rule around that line.
The object test is broader than many people think
The protected object test comes from the statute: historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest. The first clause points to ruins, structures, and landmarks. The last clause reaches further.
The early Act was tied to archeological sites and cultural heritage protection. Later practice moved beyond ruins. Cameron v. United States upheld the Grand Canyon monument. Cappaert v. United States treated the pool and pupfish at Devil’s Hole as part of the protected purpose of the monument reservation. Not every landscape qualifies automatically, but the Act is not confined to walls and artifacts.
People hear “antiquities” and assume only old stones count. The text is broader than the label.
The proclamation record, in brief
A simple monument count can mislead. A proclamation can create, enlarge, reduce, modify, or restore a monument. Acreage figures also differ sharply between land and marine monuments.
| President | Years in office | New monuments designated under the Act | Enlargement or modification proclamations | Reduction proclamations | Acres designated or affected where the source gives a figure | Example monuments | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theodore Roosevelt | 1901-1909 | 18 | other activity listed by CRS and NPS materials | not known from the cited summary | Grand Canyon National Monument was proclaimed at more than 800,000 acres | Devils Tower, Grand Canyon | CRS Appendix B; NPS materials |
| Franklin D. Roosevelt | 1933-1945 | multiple new designations listed by CRS | other activity listed by CRS | not known from the cited summary | not known from the cited summary | Joshua Tree, Capitol Reef, Jackson Hole | CRS Appendix A and B |
| Jimmy Carter | 1977-1981 | 15 Alaska monuments | later changed by Congress through the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act | none in the cited summary | about 56 million acres in Alaska | Misty Fjords, Admiralty Island, Gates of the Arctic | CRS R41330 |
| Bill Clinton | 1993-2001 | 19 | other enlargement or modification activity listed by CRS | none in the cited summary | about 5.9 million acres protected or affected | Grand Staircase-Escalante, Grand Canyon-Parashant | CRS Appendix B; NPS facts |
| George W. Bush | 2001-2009 | several new designations, including large marine monuments | other modification activity listed by CRS | none in the cited summary | more than 200 million acres, largely marine | Papahānaumokuākea, Pacific Remote Islands, Rose Atoll | CRS Appendix B; NPS facts |
| Barack Obama | 2009-2017 | 34 new or expanded national monuments in CRS and NPS summaries | included expansions and marine monument proclamations | none in the cited summary | more than 550 million acres, largely marine | Bears Ears, Northeast Canyons and Seamounts, Pacific Remote Islands expansion | CRS Appendix A and B; NPS facts |
| Donald Trump | 2017-2021 | 1 new monument identified in NPS and CRS materials | boundary changes by proclamation | 2 major reductions | Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante reductions affected more than 2 million acres in before-and-after boundaries | Camp Nelson, Bears Ears, Grand Staircase-Escalante | Federal Register proclamations; CRS R41330 |
| Joe Biden | 2021-2025 | new designations through the February 2025 CRS update | restorations and enlargements by proclamation | none in the cited summary | Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante were restored by 2021 proclamations; later proclamations stated acreage in each proclamation | Bears Ears restoration, Grand Staircase-Escalante restoration, Camp Hale-Continental Divide, Avi Kwa Ame | Federal Register proclamations; CRS R41330 |
| Donald Trump | 2025-present | current term still in progress | 2026 proclamations modified Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante | 2 reductions signed July 13, 2026 | Bears Ears reduced to about 121,100 acres; Grand Staircase-Escalante reduced to about 181,500 acres | Bears Ears, Grand Staircase-Escalante | Proclamations 11043 and 11044; CRS R49048 |
Two cautions keep the record honest. Acreage is not a perfect proxy for management burden. Congress can later alter a monument by statute. The proclamation record is part of the story, not the whole legal life of a monument.
Can a later President shrink or revoke a monument?
Creation power
- Expressly in 54 U.S.C. § 320301(a)
- Done by public proclamation
- Applies to protected objects on federal land
- Includes a land reservation limited by § 320301(b)
Reduction or revocation question
- Not expressly answered in § 320301
- Historical reductions have happened
- Modern large reductions remain contested
- Congress can alter or abolish monuments by statute
The statute answers the first half of the question. It does not expressly answer the second half.
Some presidents have tried to pare back monument boundaries. The modern dispute sharpened when President Trump reduced Bears Ears National Monument and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in 2017. President Biden restored those boundaries by proclamation in 2021. President Trump again modified and reduced both monuments by proclamations signed July 13, 2026. CRS treats presidential authority to reduce or revoke monuments as contested, not settled by § 320301.
The competing arguments are direct. One side says the power to create a reservation carries some power to adjust it, especially if the reserved area no longer fits the statutory standard. The other says Congress gave a creation power and said nothing about repeal or major reduction, so a later President cannot undo the reservation unless Congress acts.
The Supreme Court has upheld broad monument use, but not every modern reduction question. In 2026, the Tenth Circuit held that Antiquities Act monument designations are subject to judicial review and remanded the Utah challenge for the district court to interpret the Act’s limits. Congress can change a monument by statute. The Act is a delegated power over federal land; Congress keeps the bigger rulebook.
The cases that still matter
The case law is not long, so the leading opinions matter.
| Case | Court and year | Monument issue | Rule or reading that survived |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron v. United States | Supreme Court, 1920 | A mining claimant challenged the Grand Canyon National Monument designation | The Court accepted the Grand Canyon as an object of unusual scientific interest and upheld federal protection against the claim |
| Cappaert v. United States | Supreme Court, 1976 | Pumping groundwater threatened the pool and pupfish protected by the Devil’s Hole addition to Death Valley National Monument | A monument reservation can carry an implied federal reserved water right when needed to preserve the protected purpose |
| United States v. California | Supreme Court, 1978 | Offshore and submerged lands questions arose near Channel Islands National Monument | The decision forms part of the monument and federal lands case law discussed by CRS for marine and submerged contexts |
| Massachusetts Lobstermen’s Association v. Ross | D.C. Circuit, 2019 | Commercial fishing interests challenged the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument | The court upheld the marine monument designation against statutory challenges; the Supreme Court later declined review |
| Utah Association of Counties v. Biden | Tenth Circuit, 2026 | Utah plaintiffs challenged the restored Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante boundaries | The court held the claims were reviewable and remanded for the district court to decide whether the complaints plausibly alleged action beyond the Act’s limits |
Cameron is the Grand Canyon anchor. Cappaert matters because monument protection may reach water, not just dirt and stone, when reserved water is needed to preserve the protected purpose. The marine cases show the 1906 statute operating in places Congress did not describe in modern ocean terms.
What the Act does not do
The Act does not create national parks. Congress generally does that by statute. A monument may later be redesignated, but the Antiquities Act itself creates national monuments.
The Act does not cover every acre inside a drawn boundary if that land is not federal. Private land inside or near a monument remains private unless another law changes title.
The Act does not settle every management issue inside a monument. Grazing, mining, hunting, fishing, roads, water rights, tribal access, scientific research, and visitor use often turn on the proclamation, valid existing rights, the managing agency’s organic statute, and later agency decisions.
The Act does not create a general public comment process before the President signs a proclamation. Later agency work may trigger separate procedures under other statutes, but designation is a presidential act.
The Act also does not create a general environmental permit system. Its permit section covers examination of ruins, excavation of archeological sites, and gathering of objects of antiquity. It is not a Clean Water Act permit, not an Endangered Species Act incidental take permit, and not a substitute for agency planning.
After designation, management starts
Designation is the start of the legal story, not the end.
A proclamation may assign management to one or more agencies, or leave existing structures in place. Depending on the land, that may involve the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, NOAA, or another federal office. For the broader land manager picture, see Public Lands.
What happens next depends on the site. An agency may write a management plan, regulate access, address grazing or mining claims, or consult with tribes and state and local governments. Those steps can trigger separate laws. NEPA may apply to a later agency action. The Endangered Species Act may require consultation if a federal action may affect listed species. The Antiquities Act gets the monument on the books. Other statutes decide much of the rest.
The 1906 history in five lines
The Act was signed on June 8, 1906, by President Theodore Roosevelt.
Congress passed it after concern about looting, excavation, and destruction of archeological and historic resources.
The National Park Service describes it as the first general federal law protecting cultural and natural resources of historic or scientific interest on federal lands.
Devils Tower was the first national monument. The Grand Canyon became the best-known early test of how far the text could reach.
The same short statute now covers cultural sites, desert landscapes, forests, canyons, and marine areas. That is a long way from the 1906 problem Congress had in mind, but the text is still the text.
Nearby law
The Antiquities Act sits inside a larger public lands system.
The timing is the useful distinction. The Antiquities Act answers who may proclaim a monument and what the proclamation must identify. Other statutes answer what happens after the proclamation, when an agency plans, consults, permits, or regulates.
Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions
What is the Antiquities Act in simple terms?
It is a 1906 federal law that lets the President create national monuments by public proclamation on land owned or controlled by the Federal Government to protect historic, prehistoric, or scientific objects.
Which President signed the Antiquities Act?
President Theodore Roosevelt signed it on June 8, 1906. Congress passed the Act; the President signed it into law.
Is the Antiquities Act still in effect?
Yes. It is codified at 54 U.S.C. §§ 320301-320303. The current codification reflects the Title 54 recodification enacted in 2014.
Can a President shrink a monument under the Antiquities Act?
The statute does not expressly say so. That is why the reduction and revocation question remains disputed, even though presidents have attempted reductions and later presidents have restored or modified boundaries.
Can a President make a national park under the Antiquities Act?
No. The Act authorizes national monuments. National parks are generally created by Congress.
Primary sources
- 54 U.S.C. § 320301: National monuments, Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives.
- National Monuments and the Antiquities Act, R41330, updated February 11, 2025, Congressional Research Service.
- Presidential Authority Under the Antiquities Act, R49048, updated July 30, 2026, Congressional Research Service.
- Federal Land Managers of National Monuments Established Under the Authority of the Antiquities Act, National Park Service.
- Proclamation 11044: Modifying the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Federal Register / GovInfo.
Sources accessed October 24, 2026.
